Glossier Lidstar in Branch and Bun

I am not a Glossier rep and I bought the products below with my own money, but I do have a Glossier affiliate link, which will take 10% off your purchase and give me $10 in store credit.

Lidstar liquid eyeshadow seems to be one of Glossier’s most divisive products. Personally, I’m a Lidstar loyalist, and I wear my Lidstars especially often in the summer. A sheer, shimmery, sweat- and humidity-proof wash of color is my ideal eyeshadow look, and that’s exactly what Lidstar provides. But the original Lidstar shade lineup, released in early 2018 (see my review of Cub, Fawn, and Moon here), was undeniably odd. It skewed toward cool tones, offering a lavender and a green but no brown or bronze. Glossier finally corrected that deficiency last month, introducing two new shades: Bun, “a soft champagne with gold shimmer,” and Branch, “a rich bronze with gold pearl.” I would have been remiss not to order both, don’t you agree?

The Lidstars come in clear plastic test-tube-style bottles with millennial-pink caps and tiny doefoot applicators. I should note that the caps have cracked on a few of my older Lidstars, which is unsightly but doesn’t seem to have affected the performance of the product. Still, you’d expect sturdier packaging from an $18 eyeshadow.

By the way, I noticed recently that you can put together any two Lidstar shade names to produce a phrase that looks like it came from the Hipster Business Name Generator. Branch & Bun: a lumberjack-themed bakery. Cub & Fawn: a forest-themed children’s boutique. Herb & Moon: a Wiccan-themed marijuana dispensary.

I was worried that Bun and Branch would be almost identical in color (as usual, the swatches on Glossier’s website weren’t terribly helpful), but they’re quite different. Bun is a light-medium gold with small shimmer particles that blend smoothly into the formula; Branch is a dark reddish bronze with a thinner formula and larger, more sparse sparkles of gold and copper. Bun on left, Branch on right; first photo in direct sunlight, second photo in shade. They’re both dried down in these photos.

Here they are blended out; the sparkles in Branch (top) are larger and more spread-out than in Bun, so the formula looks less cohesive.

And here are Bun and Branch with my entire Lidstar collection (the only shades I don’t have are Herb and Moon), photographed in direct sun. L-R: Slip, Bun, Branch, Cub, Fawn, Lily:

I have a couple of eyeshadows that resemble Branch in color, but no near-dupes for Bun, which surprised me. Bun is a neutral gold, leaning more yellow than my bronze and taupe shades, but much less yellow than the shimmers in ColourPop Uh-Huh Honey. L-R: taupe shade from Wet n Wild Plaid to the Bone, ABH Antique Bronze, Bun, Branch, Maybelline Color Tattoo in Bad to the Bronze, ColourPop Super Shock Shadow in Muse.

All of the Lidstars I’ve tried, including Branch and Bun, have a thin, moussey texture that dries down in under a minute and is totally waterproof, not budging until I use my oil-based makeup remover. However, some Lidstar shades are more problematic than others. Bun, like Cub and Fawn, is pigmented enough that I can apply and blend it with my fingers and stop at just one layer. Branch is more like Slip and Lily: because it’s sheerer, I have to swipe it across my lid with the doefoot applicator, blend it out with a brush, and apply a second layer once the first is dry.

Here I am wearing Bun; this is two layers, though one layer looks more or less the same. On my pale, cool-toned skin, Bun reads as a subtle but noticeable gold. It works well with both warm- and cool-toned makeup looks, and because it takes just seconds to apply, I have a feeling I’ll be wearing it constantly this summer. In fact, it may have replaced Slip as my favorite Lidstar!

And here I am wearing two layers of Branch. It’s a little too dark to be an all-over lid shade for me unless I’m going for a smoky effect, and it looks slightly patchy up close. Because the sparkles in Branch are quite large, there’s also some glitter fallout, which I’ve never noticed with any of my other Lidstar shades. However, if the other Lidstars are insufficiently sparkly for your tastes, Branch might be a good choice for you.

Finally, here I am today, wearing Bun and Branch together. This is the first time in weeks that I’ve worn a bold, opaque lipstick, and I feel really weird!!! (The lipstick is NARS Red Square, of course.) Yikes, I need a haircut. I tried to schedule one last week, but it seems that everyone else in Ohio needs a haircut, too.

Close-up of Branch as an outer-corner accent for Bun (I struggle to avoid getting liquid eyeshadow on my lashes, alas):

If you’re on board with the whole Lidstar concept—that is, if your taste in eye makeup runs to the lazy and the slightly messy-looking—then I’d recommend Bun very enthusiastically and Branch a little less so. I hope Glossier continues to expand the Lidstar shade range, perhaps with a plum shade or some more pastels!

6 thoughts on “Glossier Lidstar in Branch and Bun

  1. Bun looks really nice! I’m in the same boat as you with folds in my eyelids – I’ve been experimenting with the ‘batwing’ eyeliner lately to see if I can get a flick that actually looks good on my hooded eyes! Have you tried that technique before?

    Like

    1. I haven’t (in fact, I no longer even own a liquid eyeliner), though the technique looks promising. However, your comment gave me the idea to write a new version of my very old (and now private) post on my foldy eyelids, which should appear somewhat soon!

      Like

  2. What did you think of the lidstar in lily? I feel like it’s the most polarizing lidstar, people either hate it or love it! I recall you brought it after you reviewed the original couple you had, in a post you wrote about visiting their NYC store (which was hilarious btw, as someone who lives there and is quickly approaching my limit with the city).

    Like

    1. I actually love Lily! It’s one of the shades that you have to blend with a brush to avoid patchiness, but I think it’s a very cute Y2K-looking pastel, and I wear it more often than I anticipated I would. Then again, I think I have a higher tolerance than many people for sheerness in my eyeshadows.

      Glad you enjoyed my showroom post, haha! It was very fun to write.

      Like

      1. Yes! Lily is my favorite lidstar but I find that a lot of people complain about it being patchy. I don’t mind, though, I like that it’s sheer (I feel like in the 2010s it was about being exact and perfectly blended, and it made eyeshadow a bit intimidating for me).

        If you don’t mind sheer eyeshadows, you might like the Magic Hour palette from Urban Outfitters (I know, I know, I haven’t shopped from there since high school but the palette is actually so pretty!). It’s by their beauty brand, Ohii. Idk if you tried it before but all the colors are shimmery and soft and delicate. I’ve been reaching for it a lot for the summer. Perfect for fairy like looks. I’ve been getting bored of the whole formulaic approach to eyeshadow (is a matte transition shade really mandatory?) and find that just putting a single shimmer or duochrome on my lids looks so much better.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s